Well, Gates has done it before -
mocked certain technologies and products only to see them try to overwhelm Microsoft, who then has made it a habit of
rapid-fire catchup to ensure the franchises that add billions to the Microsoft coffers are covered. But, what has he to
gain by making fun of a $100 laptop with built-in wireless mesh networking meant to assist low-income countries and
villages into sharing information among themselves and even globally? Remember, many of these people have never
seen a computer, much less Windows.Lacking a hard disk and having a smaller-than-normal screen are secondary to the potential these devices have to transform the exchange of information from and to people who previously had not even touched a computer. Is the lack of a hard drive a huge label of doom to these devices? No. Unless, of course, these devices use any recent form of Windows, considered "bloatware" by many. You don't need a Windows OS to connect people using inexpensive devices through wireless mesh networking. Although most of the civilized world is "hooked" on Windows, new customers need a cheap and intuitive interface to the world and they will be just fine. With Google backing the OLPC, this in and of itself makes me think it will flourish.
Now, if Microsoft can get the disappointing "Origami" devices to $100, I'll change my mind. But $1,000? Where is this market at? Who wants to own a full-capability laptop, an Origami device AND a Windows Smartphone?

1. Great post. I couldn't agree more. "Bloatware." I'm still laughing over that. Kudos.
Posted at 7:08PM on Mar 16th 2006 by Rand